[1]李静,于海滨*,曾全寿.基于试穿评价的不同足球鞋功能性探究[J].泉州师范学院学报,2018,(06):104-108.
 LI Jing,YU Haibin*,ZENG Quanshou.A Study on the Functions of the Different Soccer Shoes Based on the Fitting Evaluation Scale[J].,2018,(06):104-108.
点击复制

基于试穿评价的不同足球鞋功能性探究()
分享到:

《泉州师范学院学报》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
104-108
栏目:
运动科学
出版日期:
2018-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study on the Functions of the Different Soccer Shoes Based on the Fitting Evaluation Scale
文章编号:
1009-8224(2018)06-0104-05
作者:
李静1于海滨23*曾全寿4
1.泉州师范学院 纺织与服装学院, 福建 泉州 362000; 2.泉州师范学院 体育学院, 福建 泉州 362000; 3.台北市立大学体育学院,台湾 台北 11153; 4.安踏(中国)有限公司运动科学实验室, 福建 泉州 362000
Author(s):
LI Jing1YU Haibin23*ZENG Quanshou4
1.College of Textiles and Apparel,Quanzhou Normal University,Fujian 362000,China; 2.School of Physical Education,Quanzhou Normal University,Fujian 362000,China; 3.Department of Sports Sciences,University of Taipei,Taiwan 11153,China; 4.Sports Sciences Lab,ANTA(China)Sports Company,Fujian 362000,China
关键词:
足球鞋 抓地力 扭转性能 试穿实验
Keywords:
football shoes grip torsional strength fitting
分类号:
TS943.745
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
选取16名足球专项受试者,试穿评价3种不同足球运动场地条件的足球鞋,采用扭转测试仪器对 3款足球鞋的扭转性能进行测试.结果表明:3款足球鞋功能性试穿评价平均值分别为:FG3.55分、IN4.45分 和MG4.65(最高分为5分);3款足球鞋扭转10°平均值为FG1.70N?m、MG1.67N?m 和IN1.25N?m (10°),扭转30°平均值为FG2.11N?m、MG1.63N?m 和IN1.45N?m,对照竞品鞋扭转10°平均值AD11 2.59N?m、NKHV2.66N?m,AD113.04N?m、NKHV3.05N?m.从而得出:FG鞋款的抓地性和轻量化性 能较好,但并不能满足足球运动需求;MG 鞋款的整体包裹性、帮面触球感和抓地力较好,基本满足足球运动 需求;IN 鞋款整体包裹性和舒适性较好,基本满足室内足球运动需求.
Abstract:
To study the fitting performance of the three kinds of soccer shoes,and totest the torsional strength of the shoes,to provide the data and theoretical evidence forimproving the functions,16 subjects of the soccer players were chosen to evaluate thedifferent soccer shoes in the real exercise field,the torsion equipment to test theperformance of the shoes.The results show that the average scores of the fitting evaluation are FG 3.55points,MG 4.65 points and IN 4.45 points(out of 5 points).The average scores of the torsionalstrength are FG 1.70 N?m,MG 1.67 N?m,IN 1.25 N?m at 10°and FG 2.11 N?m,MG1.63 N?m,IN 1.45 N?m at 30°,competitive shoes AD11 2.59 N?m,NKHV 2.66 N?m at 10°, AD11 3.04 N?m, NKHV 3.05 N?m at 30°.FG shoes are better atgrip and lightweight performance,but can not meet the needs of the football game; MG shoes arebetter at wrapped, touched the ball and grip performance,and can basically meet the needs of thefootball game; IN shoes are better at wrapped and comfort,and can basically meet the needs ofindoor football game.

参考文献/References:

[1] LEES A,NOLAN L.The biomechanics of soccer: a review[J].Journal of SportsSciences,1998,16(3):211-234. [2] HILGERS M P,WALTHER M.Evolution of soccer shoe design[J].Athletic Therapy Today,2011,16(3):1-4. [3] SCHRIER N M, WANNOP J W,LEWINSON R T,et al.Shoe traction and surface compliance affectperformance of soccer-related movements[J].Footwear Science,2014,6(2):69-80. [4] 孙冬,GUSZTÁV Fekete,顾耀东,等.鞋钉构造对专业足球运动员在不同草坪条件下的生物力学表现分析[J].中国体育科技,2018(1):61-66. [5] 彭博,秦义,王定宣,等.不同类型的足球鞋大底在人造草坪上的动态表现[J].中国体育科技,2016(4):103-112. [6] TAYLOR S A,FABRICANT P D,Khair M M,et al.A review of synthetic playing surfaces,theshoe-surface interface,and lower extremity injuries in athletes[J].Physician & SportsMedicine,2012,40(4):66. [7] SMEETS K,JACOBS P,HERTOGS R,et al.Torsional injuries of the lower limb:an analysis ofthe frictional torque between different types of football turf and the shoe outsole[J].British Journal of Sports Medicine,2012,46(15):1078-83. [8] 中华人民共和国工业和信息化部.鞋类合脚性评价方法:QB/T 4333-2012[S].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2012:4-12. [9] 李静,于海滨.跳绳运动鞋穿着感知测试比较研究[J].中国皮革,2016,45(10):60-68.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-03-22 通信作者:于海滨(1982-),男,吉林蛟河人,副教授,博士生,从事生物力学与运动装备研究,E-mail:110235648@qq.com. 基金项目:福建省自然科学基金项目(2016J01680); 泉州市科技计划项目(2016G058)
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-15