[1]郑嘉颖.《民法总则》职务代理制度规定的评析与适用[J].泉州师范学院学报,2019,(05):96-100.
 ZHENG Jiaying.Some Understanding and Application of the Provisions of Duty Agency System in the General Rules of Civil Law[J].,2019,(05):96-100.
点击复制

《民法总则》职务代理制度规定的评析与适用()
分享到:

《泉州师范学院学报》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
96-100
栏目:
高教研究
出版日期:
2019-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Some Understanding and Application of the Provisions of Duty Agency System in the General Rules of Civil Law
文章编号:
1009-8224(2019)05-0096-05
作者:
郑嘉颖
西南政法大学 民商法学院,重庆 401120
Author(s):
ZHENG Jiaying
Civil and Commercial Law School, Southwest University of Political Science & Law, Chongqing 401120,China
关键词:
《民法总则》 职务代理 越权代理
Keywords:
General Rules of Civil Law post agency ultra vires agency
分类号:
D923.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
职务代理制度对于解释法人或非法人组织职员与该法人或非法人组织及其交易相对人之间的关系规则具有积极意义。《民法总则》新增关于职务代理制度的规定,考虑到了商事领域对交易安全的独特价值需求,同时弥补了法定代表人制度与委托代理制度的不足。然而,职务代理制度在《民法总则》中的规范建构尚存在界限模糊和易混淆地带,这些问题所导致的法政策的不确定性,可能在司法实务中造成理解障碍与适用上的困惑。运用法解释学分析方法对《民法总则》第一百七十条相关概念和意义进行拆分解释,以梳理职务代理制度与法定代表人代表制度、狭义无权代理制度及表见代理制度的适用关系,并从法经济学视角论证了职务代理制度的内在价值倾向选择符合经济效率之要求。
Abstract:
The system of agency is of positive significance in explaining the relationship between the staff and the legal person or the unincorporated organization and its trading counterpart, and systematize the corresponding contextual rules. In the General Rules of Civil Law of China, the new regulations on the duty agency have been added, which takes into account the unique value demand for transaction security in the commercial field; and at the same time, makes up for the deficiencies of the legal representative system and the principal-agent system. However, in the General Rules of Civil Law of China, there are still some blurred and confusing zones in the normative construction of the duty agency system. The uncertainties of law and policy caused by these problems may cause obstacles of understanding and confusion of application in judicial practice. This paper uses the method of hermeneutic to analyze the relevant concepts and meanings of Article 170 of the General Rules of Civil Law, and to interpret the applicable relations between the system of duty agency and the system of legal representative, the system of narrow ex-agency and the system of apparent agency. At the same time, from the perspective of economics, this paper also demonstrates that the intrinsic value of the agency system conforms to the requirements of economic efficiency.

参考文献/References:

[1] 刘静波.以职务代理完善我国代理制度——以公司交易实践为视角[J].新疆大学学报(哲学·人文社会科学版),2012,40(2):46-50.
[2] 曹治国,王瑜芳.再论一般职员职务行为的效力认定——从《民法通则》第43条到《民法总则》第170条[J].华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2018(1):72-81.
[3] 蒋大兴.《民法总则》的商法意义——以法人类型区分及规范构造为中心[J].比较法研究,2017(4):53-74.
[4] 梁彗星.民法总论(第五版)[M].北京:法律出版社,2017.
[5] 谭启平.中国民法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2015.
[6] 聂卫峰.职权代理的规范理路与法律表达——《民法总则》第170条评析[J].北方法学,2018(2):54-64.
[7] 吴京辉,金恩雨.《民法总则》背景下商事表见代理的制度回应[J].社会科学,2017(9):108-118.
[8] 刘文科.商事代理法律制度论[M].北京:法律出版社,2013.
[9] N.格里高利·曼昆.经济学原理(第七版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2015.
[10] 陈自强.代理权与经理权之间——民商合一与民商分立[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:郑嘉颖(1995-),女,福建厦门人,硕士生,主要从事民商法研究。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-15