[1]苏恩.动态系统视域下双言者二语口语输出的跟踪研究[J].泉州师范学院学报,2020,(01):48-54.
 SU En.A Tracking Study of Min-Mandarin Speakers' L2 Oral Language DevelopmentBased on Dynamic System Theory[J].,2020,(01):48-54.
点击复制

动态系统视域下双言者二语口语输出的跟踪研究()
分享到:

《泉州师范学院学报》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年01期
页码:
48-54
栏目:
语言研究
出版日期:
2020-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Tracking Study of Min-Mandarin Speakers' L2 Oral Language DevelopmentBased on Dynamic System Theory
文章编号:
1009-8224(2020)01-0048-07
作者:
苏恩
厦门理工学院 外国语学院,福建 厦门 361024
Author(s):
SU En
School of International Languages,Xiamen University of Technology,Fujian 361024,China
关键词:
二语口语 语言初始状态 动态系统理论
Keywords:
L2 Oral Language initial states dynamic systems theory
分类号:
H313.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
受社会母语经验影响,中国英语学习者的语言初始状态不尽相同。基于动态系统理论,历时考察学习者的语言初始状态不同对两组被试(普通话单言者和闽-普双言者)英语口语产出的复杂性、准确性和流利性的动态发展轨迹进行分析。研究发现: 第一,普通话单言者在复杂性方面已经进入瓶颈期,而闽-普双言者的口语复杂性还存在一定的发展空间。第二,在口语词汇准确度方面,普通话单言者的发展路径持续上升且稳定。第三,两组被试英语二语口语流利度发展路径是不同的,闽-普双言者比普通话单言者更早进入语言学习中自我调控的状态。该研究对方言地区英语口语教学实践具有一定的指导意义。
Abstract:
Chinese L2 learners have various initial states affected by their social mother tongue experience.The present study aims to investigate how the L2 speaking develops over time under the influence of different initial states in groups of Mandarin speakers and Min-Mandarin speakers within the framework of Dynamic System Theory(DST).The result shows that firstly,complexity of the oral language of Mandarin speakers has entered into a bottleneck period though indeed increased over time,while Min-Mandarin speakers still possess development potential; secondly,accuracy of the oral language of Mandarin speakers keeps growing and steady; thirdly,fluency developmental paths of the oral language of two groups are different,Min-Mandarin speakers get into self-regulation state earlier.Research findings may have some implications for oral English teaching in dialect regions of China.

参考文献/References:

[1] Skehan,P & P.Foster.Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance[J].Language Teaching Research,1997(3):185-211.
[2] 朱玉明,刘飞兵.学生方言语音对外语听说的影响及对策[J].湘潭大学学报(社会科学版),2002(4):122-126.
[3] 彭庆华.应用语言学研究中“语言能力”的新解释及其多元[J].山东外语教学,2010(3):9-13.
[4] Yuan,F.& R.Ellis.The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency,complexity and accuracy in L2 mono-logic oral production[J].Applied Linguistics,2003(1):1-27.
[5] 李茜.任务类型及任务频次对英语学习者口语产出的影响[J].外语与外语教学,2015(6):42-48.
[6] Van Geert,P.Dynamic Systems of Development:Change Between Complexity and Chaos[M].New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf,1994.
[7] Larsen-Freeman,D. & L.Cameron.Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2008.
[8] De Bot,K.& D.Larsen-Freeman. Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective[A].In M. Verspoor,K.de Bot & W.Lowie(eds.).A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development[C].Amsterdam: John Benjamins.2011:5-23.
[9] Van Geert,P.& M.Van Dijk. Focus on variability:New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data[J].Infant Behavior and Development,2002(25):340-374.
[10] Cancino H.,Rosansky E.,Schumann J..The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers[G]//HATCH E M.Second Language Acquisition: A Book of Readings. Rowley:Newbury House,1978:207-230.
[11] Larsen-Freeman,D.& L.Cameron.Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics[M].Oxford: Oxford University Press,2008.
[12] Larsen-Freeman,D.The emergence of complexity, fluency,and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English [J].Applied Linguistics,2006(4):590-619.
[13] Spoelman,M.& M.Verspoor.Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity:A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish [J].Applied Linguistics,2010(4):532-553.
[14] Herdina,P.& U.Jessner.The implications of language attrition for dynamic systems theory: Next steps and conse-quences[J].International Journal of Bilingualism,2013(6):752-756.
[15] Herdina,P.& U.Jessner.A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism: Perspectives of Change in Psycholinguistics[M].Multi-lingual Matters,2002.
[16] Polat,B.& Y.Kim.Dynamics of complexity and accuracy:A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development[J].Applied Linguistics,2014(2):184-207.
[17] 李茶,隋铭才.基于复杂理论的英语学习者口语复杂度、准确度、流利度发展研究[J].外语教学与研究(外国语文双月刊),2017(5):392-404.
[18] 苏恩.语言初始状态对二语词汇复杂性发展的影响[J].厦门理工学院学报,2019(8):61-67.
[19] 杨艳霞.方言对英语语音的负迁移影响与语音习得调查分析[J].淮北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(2):177-180.
[20] 胡永祥,李荣宝.方言经验对儿童句法意识发展的影响[J].外国语,2015(4):58-67.
[21] Foster,P,A.Tonkyn & G.Wigglesworth.Measuring spoken language:A unit for all reasons[J].Applied Linguistics,2000(3):354-375.
[22] Van Geert,P.& M.Van Dijk.Focus on variability:New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data[J].Infant Behavior and Development,2002(25):340-374.
[23] 安颖.基于动态系统理论的大学英语二语口语发展中的变异研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2018.
[24] 于涵静.英语学习者口语复杂性、准确性的动态发展研究[J].外语与外语教学,2019(2):100-110.
[25] Verspoor,Marjolijn,Smiskova,Hana.Foreign language writing development from a dynamic usage based perspective[J].L2 Writing Development: Multiple Perspectives,2012:17-46.
[26] 张积家,崔占玲.藏-汉-英双语者字词识别中的语码切换及其代价[J].心理学报,2008(2):136-147.
[27] 李光泽,李荣宝.方言经验与双言者认知控制发展研究的生态学视角[J].宁德师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(1):66-70.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-05-20
作者简介:苏恩(1985-),女,福建泉州人,副教授,硕士,主要从事应用语言学研究。
基金项目:福建省社会科学规划项目(FJ2018C097)
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-15